Mythic Resonance

22 Jan

To quote Treebeard ‘… the world is changing: I feel it in the water, I feel it in the earth and I smell it in the air.’ It always surprises me when I hear other fantasy writers and readers say that they find Lord of the Rings, Gormenghast and many of the other masterworks of fantasy hard going. When I first came across these books they held me spellbound for weeks on end – I’d never read anything like them and everything else in the world at large (let alone in the world of books) seemed to just fade away while I was under their spell. In one sense, though, it should perhaps not be so difficult to understand. These days it is more likely than not that someone who reads fantasy will only come to Tolkien after having read other, more modern books, most likely in the growing field of young adult fantasy, which is spearheaded by the likes of J K Rowling and Philip Pullman. Written in an up-to-date, engaging and above all understandable manner, Harry Potter and its ilk are in stark contrast to what must to many people seem the dessicated writings of an out of touch Oxford Don sitting in his ivory tower over half a century ago. It should also be noted that very many people will now only come to Tolkien’s book in light of the (well-deserved) critical and commercial success of Peter Jackson’s film versions. Anyone who came out of the cinema thinking ‘Cool, a book about lots of vikings and elves killing trolls and scary-looking guys in cloaks!’ might well be left feeling bewildered and annoyed by Tolkien’s dense, plodding prose and old-fashioned language. Even back in the 1950s when it was first published, Lord of the Rings must have presented a conundrum to its publishers, let alone the book-buying public. Here was a novel that was over one thousand pages long, with over a hundred pages of additional appendices, filled with hundreds of characters (very many of whom only appear for a handful of pages, if that) and poems in invented languages that in many cases the author did not even bother to translate! Despite all of this Lord of the Rings is to this day often voted the most popular novel in all of English Literature and Tolkien the most popular author. His influence on the field of epic fantasy remains palpable in the form of his many imitators and his work has more devotees and fan clubs all over the world than almost any other writer. Why do people read and re-read Tolkien’s books? What makes them so powerful and enduring?

There is one explanation for his success that I can give – I think it may have something to do with language. An epic tale needs an epic, poetic voice, a voice with a hint of the ancient world, an understanding that the storyteller is dealing with a heroic age. The key here is to get just the right amount of archaism into your writing and Tolkien, as a professor of language and a connoisseur of words, was qualified to do this in a way that few others have ever been. He turned to the ancient Finnish, Norse, Welsh and Anglo-Saxon epics like The Elder Eddas, The Kalevala, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and Beowulf as examples when he wrote, and it shows:

‘I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor. You cannot pass. The dark fire will not avail you, flame of Udûn. Go back to the Shadow! You cannot pass.’ – The Fellowship of the Ring

“Dotard! What is the House of Eorl but a thatched barn where brigands drink in the reek, and their brats roll on the floor among the dogs? Too long have they escaped the gibbet themselves. But the noose comes, slow in the drawing, tight and hard in the end. Hang if you will!” – The Two Towers

“Come not between the Nazgûl and his prey! Or he will not slay thee in thy turn. He will bear thee away to the houses of lamentation, beyond all darkness, where thy flesh shall be devoured, and thy shrivelled mind be left naked to the Lidless Eye.” – The Return of the King

If none of that makes you shiver, you might just be dead inside…

My other explanation for Tolkien’s continuing popularity is that, in some way, we all need mythology. Not just because myths and legends are entertaining stories, or because some of them come attached with a handy moral. We need them, the way we require vitamins or sunlight. This need for myth became especially acute after the First World War, when all the certainties of the old values were swept away and also when, not coincidentally, Tolkien first began writing his tales. Part of his genius was that he realized this hunger still existed, despite all the marvels of the modern world. He knew that people desired epic stories of quests, dragons, treasure, magic, wonders, terrors, loss and redemption, of heroes stretched nearly beyond their capacity for endurance. But Tolkien’s genius also showed itself in the way that he was able to satisfy that hunger. He revived an old form and somehow made it speak to the present. He spent literally decades constructing his world, making it consistent, giving it languages, poetry, history and art, making it so real that we might almost believe that he had discovered it rather than invented it. He gave it characters of stature – metaphorical if not literal – and he set in motion a story that the public read again and again. Tolkien’s gift for storytelling, his solidly constructed world and his flair for language all make him a true myth-maker and we have had precious few of those in our time. This may well be reason enough to celebrate Tolkien’s work and to hope that he continues to be read well into the 21st century and beyond.

Of all of the authors that I’ve encountered since reading Tolkien, the only ones who really seem to have understood the importance of language and mythic resonance in their fantasy novels have been Ursula Le Guin in the lyrical, captivating Earthsea series and Robert Holdstock in the brooding, powerful Mythago sequence. The best modern example that I can think of is Robin Hobb, although her books do tend to be a little too padded for my tastes sometimes. Nonetheless, all of these authors seem to appreciate, as Tolkien did, that fantasy fiction is not just about ‘hack and slash’ and can handle universal human themes as well as any other genre. One final point I should make is that my view of Tolkien is in some respects coloured by the way in which I first came across his books. I read The Hobbit when I was very young, loved it, and only read Lord of the Rings in my early teens. At my local library (I borrowed almost everything I read back in those happy days) there were no copies of The Fellowship of the Ring available for years on end, so eventually I got fed up waiting and actually read The Two Towers first. Later, I was glad that I did this because in the second part of the Rings trilogy you are thrust straight into the action of what is by that stage in many ways a darker, more urgent and more intense story. Even at the time I didn’t feel that I had particularly missed out on anything because I was already pretty clued up on the background and setting from having read The Hobbit first. I can well appreciate, however, that the leisurely manner in which the story unfolds in Fellowship may well put off many first time readers, especially if they have not come across The Hobbit at a younger age, as I did. I’ll therefore end this post with a recommendation – if you’ve never read Rings before or have been put off by the first few chapters of Fellowship, it might be worth giving the trilogy one last go, but this time starting with Towers. Don’t worry, Tolkien also wrote a handy synopsis to fill the reader in on the first part of the story (that’s if you need it given that there’s also a film and cartoon version of Fellowship to watch!)

Advertisements

27 Responses to “Mythic Resonance”

  1. The Heretic January 22, 2012 at 7:14 am #

    I love Gormenghast. My favorite characters were Prunesqualler and his slightly crazy sister, as well as Lady Fuschia.

  2. nimslake January 22, 2012 at 1:58 pm #

    Well done. I read ‘The Hobbit’ twice. Once before the animation was done and then after to see how it compared and still loved the attempt to try to bring something complex to screen.

    It was about 10 years before I even clapped eyes on the LOTR trilogy and this was pre-Terry Brooks experience.
    I have great respect for the amount of depth that was infused on the books and Tolkien really set the bar high for future writers. I really enjoy the attention to detail.
    [Thanks for the names of the other authors will be adding them to my list to checkout. I’ve read this book ‘The Saga of the Volsungs’. Now I need to read more along that line. ;-)]

  3. fantasyfurnace January 22, 2012 at 3:00 pm #

    As far as Tolkien being imitated, what they say is so true and so relevant, ” Imitation is the highest form of flattery.” And, after all they are imitating the best!
    The Hobbitt has been read and enjoyed by all in our house!

    Great research, wonderful insight, excellent post!

  4. jasondegray January 22, 2012 at 6:49 pm #

    Really impressed with your comments on the importance of myth in our culture. Tolkien gave a speech about it that can be found in the ’74 edition of Ballantine’s Tolkien reader.

  5. phoenixfirewolf January 22, 2012 at 7:46 pm #

    Thanks so much for your great and insightful post. I love LOTR, the books and the movies. Good stuff that… Epic fantasy is my crack!

    Julie

  6. sweetlisteria January 22, 2012 at 7:58 pm #

    Came by to say ‘Thanks!’ for following my blog. I love what I’m reading here and I’m sure I’ll come away with lots of new material to check out as well as new thoughts on Fantasy in general. 🙂

  7. DarkJackal January 22, 2012 at 8:38 pm #

    Excellent article! To me Tolkien’s lasting appeal is the overwhelming complexity. I will never be an expert in it because there is so much to take in. The same cannot be said for Rowling.

  8. Sherilyn January 23, 2012 at 3:02 am #

    Great article! I remember reading The Hobbit and Fellowship when I was 13 and not being able to get through Two Towers because it was too grim. I was in my twenties before a friend talked me into trying the whole trilogy–right after I finished Earthsea. I agree that Tolkien and LeGuin’s appreciation of language adds to the mythic quality of their work. I haven’t read Holdstock, but I’m definitely going to take a look at him now!

  9. Roxi January 23, 2012 at 9:50 am #

    Wonderful post/tribute to Tolkien’s work! 🙂

  10. soundscryer January 23, 2012 at 8:30 pm #

    Great post. I was first captured by LOTR when I was 15, after two abortive attempts to get through Fellowship, as well. I finally made it through, however, by starting with the scenes from Fellowship in the Prancing Pony, after which the story really takes off. (I’d seen the Ralph Bakshi animated version, which fans seem to have universally loathed, and it convinced me to give it another try- so if nothing else, I’ll be grateful to Ralph for that.)

    I have since read the trilogy 25+ times – once a year from age 15 to 35, and about once every other year since – and the same question you pose here (why it’s so captivating) led me to read many other Tolkien and Tolkien-inspired works. The Silmarillion, The Children of Hurin, The Hobbit, and finally all 12 volumes of The History of Middle-earth, were some of these. I came away from all of those pages with the same conclusion you’ve drawn, and in fact one that I suspected all along but couldn’t articulate: the stories feel old, ancient and translated many times through the years, and because of the weight of those years and that meticulous history that’s just under the surface, they simply feel REAL. Like they actually could have happened long ago, and maybe not so far away.

    I believe I’ve given you links to my thoughts on Tolkien and on finishing the Histories, but in case I didn’t part 1 can be found here: http://soundscryer.com/2011/06/13/christopher-tolkien-the-history-of-middle-earth/ and part 2 here: http://soundscryer.com/2011/12/02/christopher-tolkien-the-history-of-middle-earth-part-two/.

    Thanks for the great post, and keep them coming!

    Michael

  11. deshipley January 23, 2012 at 11:48 pm #

    The LotR triology does indeed a very ancient feel to it. I’m perpetually surprised to remember that they were only written a few decades ago!
    I finished “Fellowship” around Christmas and am just past the middle of “Two Towers”, now (for the second time; I fell off the wagon mid-“Return of the King”, during my last attempt), but I’m determined to have all three books finished before this summer, because come on — it’s “Lord of the Rings”!

  12. lilybet January 24, 2012 at 11:00 am #

    I totally agree with you about humanity loving and needing mythology. We are, for all our technology, the ‘story-telling ape’. I think that although Tolkien’s difficult for some can be atributed to the shift in language, Gormenghast is a different matter. I have read Tolkien but couldn’t manage Peake – possibly it has to do with his deteriorating state of mind at the time of writing?
    Great post – looking forward to more. Excellent fuel for the fires of fantasy.
    (P.S. Thank you for following my blog.)

    • ashsilverlock January 24, 2012 at 2:41 pm #

      Yes, Peake is definitely tougher but I find that he has some interesting things to say under all that rambling, gothic prose

  13. Finder January 24, 2012 at 2:15 pm #

    You had me at the quote quote from Treebeard. 🙂

  14. harmamae January 25, 2012 at 5:52 am #

    Yes, I’ve gone on and on about why Tolkien is so great on my blog too. 🙂 I think it does have a lot to do with his language. And I read ‘The Hobbit’ first as a kid, like most people, and put off reading ‘Lord of the Rings’ for a long time because it was so thick and long. I think the slow beginning actually helped me. The first bit of ‘Lord of the Rings’ was so similar to ‘The Hobbit,’ it was comforting. I was afraid it would be way over my head.

  15. ladyruna February 23, 2012 at 9:32 am #

    Lovely post 🙂 I especially liked the point about the necessity of myths.
    I have to disagree with regard to the Harry Potter series, though, as for a lot of more…recent Tolkien fans they played the part that The Hobbit played for the older ones. An enticing, albeit much simpler, insight into a fantastic world which makes you want more. Smart readers who open The Lord of the Rings, whether or not they started out as Rowling/Pullman-fans, will realize its huge value.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

NBA.com | Hang Time Blog

The official news blog of NBA.com with commentary and analysis from NBA.com's staff of writers.

Beechdey's Weblog

A general web which talks about local or world issues that affect us all

An Unexpected Life Chosen

A freelance writer, clairvoyant medium, credit manager, chakra meditation teacher, traveller, animal lover, past-life healer, and a change advocate.........having walked many paths, I ask; did I really sign up for this?

The Story of the Four

Forays into Fantasy, Myth, and Culture by Josh Bertetta, Ph.D.

Wild Grace

soul retrieval + practical magic

The Lonely Refinery

Mostly rambling about various things

Decoration Themes

Home Decor and Design

Wandersail

"This is my sacred fire. This is my holy place. These are the words of my prayer."

breathofgreenair

mindfulness, relaxation, thought provoking images and poems

♥ spin your circle bright ♥

Simple celebrations and seasonal connection ♥

Journey of a Dutch Witch

The spiritual journey of a young sports lover from Holland

Sunny District

Welcome to my happy place!

A photo blog

(Does exactly what it says on the tin)

My 2nd Closet

-- With my set-aside lovelies <3

The Druid Bird

thoughts from a warped reality

Living Fae

Reflecting Inside Out

Bastet and Sekhmet's Library

Stories, poems and thoughts about things I find interesting!

%d bloggers like this: